Paste a lease, a rent increase notice, an eviction notice, an agent's email — get back, in plain English, what's enforceable and what isn't, plus the letter or NCAT pack that handles it. Every claim cites the Residential Tenancies Act 2010 (NSW).
PASTE · READ · SEND · ALL CITED
This page is a full orientation. Read it once, then go.
Every Australian rental dispute is between two people playing the same game with different equipment. The landlord has a paid agent who works leases every day. The lease itself was drafted by a law firm. The agent has a script for every renter manoeuvre, refined over decades.
The renter has whatever they Googled at 11pm, two days before NCAT.
That's the asymmetry. It's not the rent crisis. It's not the housing crisis. It's the informationcrisis underneath both — the one that decides who keeps their bond, who gets evicted on a notice that wouldn't survive a hearing, and who pays $300 a week more than the market because they didn't know they could challenge it.
What this costs renters, today
Most renters arrive in one of three modes. Pick the one that's closest and ignore the rest for now.
ABOUT TO SIGN
Paste the lease into the lease check. In 60 seconds you'll have a health score, a list of every clause that disadvantages you, and a verdict on each — unenforceable, legitimate but worth negotiating, or fine. Includes the precise section of the Act behind each call.
You walk into the signing knowing exactly which clauses are bluffs.
MIDDLE OF A FIGHT
Use the triage tool. Describe what's happening in your own words. It routes you to the right tool (eviction defender, bond return, rent increase challenge), drafts the letter, and if it gets to NCAT, builds the full case packet — chronology, evidence index, application form.
A calm, professional response goes out within the hour, citing the Act.
QUICK QUESTION
The free Q&A answers anything across NSW tenancy law. Type a question, get an answer with the section cited. Agent says they can come on Saturday with two days' notice? Section 55 requires seven. The platform tells you.
You stop second-guessing yourself.
This is the real shape of what you get. A short faux example from each headline tool — the kind of language, structure, and citation you'll see when you run your own matter.
Sample · lease check verdict
Health 3/10Lease Health Score: 3/10 · 12 red flags identified · Estimated cost to you if signed as-is: $2,400–$4,000
UNENFORCEABLE "The tenant agrees to pay a $50 lease administration fee on signing." — Application fees and admin fees were banned in NSW on 19 May 2025. The only money a landlord can ask for is rent and bond.
UNENFORCEABLE "Strictly no pets are permitted on the premises." — Blanket pet bans aren't binding post-19-May-2025. The landlord can only refuse a pet on specific prescribed grounds, and silence after a 21-day request equals consent.
DISADVANTAGEOUS "Mandatory professional carpet cleaning at end of tenancy." — Not automatically enforceable. Only if your carpets were professionally cleaned at move-in (per the condition report). Otherwise the standard is "reasonably clean" (s.51).
Sample · eviction verdict
LIKELY INVALID
Termination date stated: 30 Aug 2026 · Your deadline to dispute at NCAT: 24 Jun 2026
The notice does not specify a prescribed ground from the list in the Act. From 19 May 2025, NSW abolished no-grounds termination — the landlord must rely on a specific reason (sale, owner moving in, demolition, etc) and attach supporting documents. The Termination Information Statement is also missing.
Sample · response letter (excerpt)
Most platforms in this space give you fact sheets. Renterprise gives you the document the situation needs.
Lease check
A score out of 100 plus every disadvantageous clause flagged with verdict and Act citation. Includes a one-page summary you can take to the signing meeting.
Bond return
An honest read of which deductions are legitimate (you owe) versus fair wear and tear (the landlord absorbs), and a calm letter for the disputed portion, citing s.51.
Rent increase
A check that the notice meets the 60-day / once-per-12-months rule, market comparables for the area, and (if it's excessive) a drafted NCAT application within the 30-day window.
Eviction
Validates the notice against the post-19-May-2025 rules — including the Termination Information Statement requirement and the re-letting restrictions — and builds your defence with timeline and witness list.
NCAT case
Chronology, evidence index, NCAT application form, hearing briefing, lawyer brief. Same paperwork a $500 consult would produce — done in 15 minutes.
Free Q&A
Plain-English answer with the section it comes from. Streamed live. Educational only — not legal advice — but it's grounded in the verified citation allowlist, not in the AI's vibes.
No trial walls. The free tools are genuinely free and answer most renter questions on their own. The paid Toolkit unlocks the heavy artillery — the formal letters, the dispute packs, the NCAT case builder.
Free, forever
Paid Toolkit · $49 (launch week)
When a dispute starts, you don't need a chatbot. You need a process. Every Renterprise tool runs the same four steps:
You paste the lease, notice, or agent email. Renterprise identifies every issue and cites the Act section it relies on. Verified citations only — the AI is gated against an allowlist of section numbers and refuses to invent new ones.
Not 'you might have a case.' A concrete classification: unenforceable, legitimate but asymmetric, or fine. If you're in the wrong, it says so — and tells you which line items are worth fighting and which to pay.
A calm, professional letter you can edit and send. Cites the Act. Doesn't threaten. Reads like it came from a paralegal because the prompt was written by one. You pick the tone — gentle, neutral, firm — based on the relationship.
Chronology, evidence index, application form, hearing briefing, lawyer brief. Same paperwork a $500 consultation would produce — done in 15 minutes. Designed to work whether you bring a lawyer to the hearing or represent yourself.
There are other things you could do. Honest comparison:
Compared to
Where it's strong
Authoritative. Can represent you at NCAT. Right move for complex matters or appeals.
Where it falls short
A first phone call is $300–$500. A bond dispute consult plus drafting is $1,500+. Most renter matters don't justify the cost.
Renterprise
Renterprise covers the same documents a lawyer's first hour produces, for $49 across every matter for six months. When a matter is genuinely complex, we tell you to call one.
Compared to
Where it's strong
Accurate. Free. Authoritative. Cited.
Where it falls short
Not actionable. Tells you the law but doesn't write the letter. Doesn't apply it to your specific lease, your specific notice, your specific bond claim.
Renterprise
We use Fair Trading content as the truth and turn it into the document your situation actually needs. The Act citation appears on every output.
Compared to
Where it's strong
Free. Real humans. Genuinely helpful when you get through.
Where it falls short
Volume crisis — average wait is 45+ minutes, and they can't ghostwrite letters for you. They can advise. They can't draft.
Renterprise
No wait. We complement the helpline rather than replacing it. Most users do both: helpline for the strategic advice, Renterprise for the document.
Compared to
Where it's strong
Free. You learn the law. Maximum agency.
Where it falls short
At 11pm two days before the hearing, you don't have the cycles. Most tenants who try this end up either paying the disputed amount or filing a sloppy NCAT application that loses.
Renterprise
Same agency, none of the staring-at-a-blank-page tax. You paste; we draft; you edit and send. Twenty minutes instead of twenty hours.
AI tools are everywhere right now and most of them hallucinate. Here's why Renterprise doesn't — or, more honestly, why when it does, the structural defences catch it before you see it.
Every AI output is checked against a hard-coded list of real NSW Act sections (s.38, s.41, s.51, s.55, s.62, s.84, s.107, s.159, s.187, etc.). If the AI tries to cite a section that doesn't exist, the output validator strips it before it reaches you.
A server-side check on every AI response. Strips fabricated citations, flags suspect claims, prepends a verification banner when the answer touches uncertain territory. You see when the platform is sure and when it isn't.
The fairness rule baked into every prompt: if you're in the wrong, the platform tells you. We won't help you build a case you don't have. That's why agents respect our letters — they read like a paralegal who's done the analysis honestly, not a chatbot that just wants to please.
A bond dispute deserves a different tone than a rental application. The fairness rule flips: when you're presenting yourself as a tenant (lease comparison, move-in report, application), the platform advocates for you. When you're in a dispute (bond, eviction), it assesses honestly. The mode determines the voice.
Every page says it. Every PDF footer says it. Every letter footer says it. We're a paralegal-quality starting point, not a replacement for a solicitor when one is needed.
The platform exists because a USYD law student spent two years reading the Residential Tenancies Act 2010 (NSW) section by section. The prompts, the citations, the tone decisions all came from someone who'd be cross-examined on them.
The credibility comes from being honest about the limits. Here's the line:
If the landlord's claim against your bond is legitimately tenant damage, the bond tool will say to pay it and negotiate the rest. That's why agents respect the letters.
The AI is gated against the verified citation allowlist. It refuses to make legal claims outside it. No hallucinated sections, no invented case law, no fictional NCAT precedents.
Renterprise is educational. For complex matters, appeals beyond NCAT, criminal matters, or anything that smells like litigation, you still want a lawyer. We make the easy 80% solvable yourself and tell you exactly when to escalate.
Everything lives in your browser by default. The paid Toolkit saves matters to your device. The platform's incentives are on the renter side. Always.
Renterprise is NSW-only at launch. The Act is different in every state — pretending otherwise would be the exact hallucination we built the citation allowlist to prevent. Other states later.
Every output is a starting point you should read, edit, and own before you send. The platform writes the first draft. You are the lawyer of record on your own life.
A composite, based on the kinds of matters NSW renters bring up most. Names changed; substance and outcomes representative.
Scenario · bond return
$2,400 bond. The agent claims $1,640 — $640 for “professional carpet clean,” $400 for “wall scuffs,” $600 for “general cleaning.”
The renter, Sarah, is renting in Marrickville on a teacher's salary. The lease was for two years. She moved out two weeks ago. She thinks the claim is bullshit but doesn't know which parts.
10 minutes in Renterprise:Sarah pastes the agent's claim plus a photo of the move-in condition report. The bond tool runs the Honest Assessment.
Result:
Bond tool generates: a dispute letter to the agent agreeing to the $200, disputing the rest, citing s.51. Lodged at Rental Bonds Online with the same evidence.
Outcome (typical): the landlord settles for the $200 within two weeks rather than going to NCAT and losing. Sarah keeps $2,200 of her bond, where she would otherwise have probably accepted around $760.
Sarah's alternative: pay a lawyer $300–500 for the same advice, or accept the agent's claim. Most renters in her situation accept. The $49 toolkit changes the math.
Ready
If you're sure what you need, head straight to that tool. If you're not sure, tell us what's going on in your own words and we'll route you to the right place.